Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-17 03:40:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I agree we need triage, and have no problem if you lead that. But lets
> wait until early Feb, please.

See my later response in the thread, where I corrected my initial
recollection (of the first proposal) to be what the meeting minutes
say we agreed to.  However, since we already missed the scheduling
agreed to then, the question that's on the table now is what we should
do instead.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 01:34:41 from Simon Riggs


  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 04:48:59 from Abhijit Menon-Sen

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Abhijit Menon-SenDate: 2013-01-17 03:56:49
Subject: Re: Hot Standby conflict resolution handling
Previous:From: Jeff JanesDate: 2013-01-17 03:32:28
Subject: Re: Parallel query execution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group