Re: CF3+4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-17 03:40:07
Message-ID: 9702.1358394007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I agree we need triage, and have no problem if you lead that. But lets
> wait until early Feb, please.

See my later response in the thread, where I corrected my initial
recollection (of the first proposal) to be what the meeting minutes
say we agreed to. However, since we already missed the scheduling
agreed to then, the question that's on the table now is what we should
do instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 01:34:41 from Simon Riggs

Responses

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 04:48:59 from Abhijit Menon-Sen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2013-01-17 03:56:49 Re: Hot Standby conflict resolution handling
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-01-17 03:32:28 Re: Parallel query execution