Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: assam258(at)gmail(dot)com, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2026-03-17 13:57:39
Message-ID: 96fe9a0f-7811-407c-b1c0-0bb0d58ef04c@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.03.26 16:54, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> The patch looks fine to me. While reviewing it, I noticed that the
> function has an extra loop to count the number of variables. I don't
> think it's needed. The count can be obtained from the list length. In
> the attached patch, I have removed that loop. Am I missing something?
>
> 0001 is your patch
> 0002 removes the loop + some cosmetic changes

committed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2026-03-17 13:59:10 Re: pgsql: Add pg_plan_advice contrib module.
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2026-03-17 13:54:29 Re: Need help debugging SIGBUS crashes