Re: Patch to add table function support to PL/Tcl (Todo item)

From: Karl Lehenbauer <karllehenbauer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to add table function support to PL/Tcl (Todo item)
Date: 2010-12-28 21:52:44
Message-ID: 96615F3C-7118-418D-BC3A-FBBA0CDCC875@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hmm, I ran the code through pgindent so I don't understand why there are whitespace changes.

OK I'll see what the problem is with the whitespace and instead produce two patches, one that converts to using Tcl objects and one on top of that that adds returning records and setof records.

On Dec 28, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Excerpts from Karl Lehenbauer's message of mar dic 28 12:33:42 -0300 2010:
>> Project name: Add table function support to PL/Tcl (Todo item)
>>
>> What the patch does:
>>
>> This patch adds table function support (returning record and SETOF record)
>> to PL/Tcl. This patch also updates PL/Tcl to use the Tcl object-style
>> interface instead of the older string-style one, increasing performance.
>
> While I don't use PL/Tcl myself, this seems a reasonable idea. However,
> I think this patch does too many things in one step. It also contains
> numerous superfluous whitespace changes that make it hard to assess its
> real size.
>
> I'd recommend splitting it up and dropping the whitespace changes (which
> would be reverted by pgindent anyway).
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-28 21:57:34 Re: pg_dump --split patch
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2010-12-28 21:44:13 Re: pg_dump --split patch