Re: code coverage patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michelle Caisse <Michelle(dot)Caisse(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Date: 2008-08-28 14:24:10
Message-ID: 9632.1219933450@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Korry Douglas wrote:
>> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way
>> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

> I think only bison supports that directive.

We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no? It's been years since
I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain
yacc.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-28 14:51:42 Re: What happend to equality_oper()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-08-28 14:00:21 Re: code coverage patch