Re: code coverage patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michelle Caisse <Michelle(dot)Caisse(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Date: 2008-08-28 14:00:21
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Korry Douglas wrote:
>> 1) Use bison's -o option to put the output file in the right place
>> directly,
>> if we are dealing with bison (and don't bother to support code coverage
>> analysis with other yaccs), or
>> 2) Run a pattern replacement across the grammar output files as their are
>> renamed.
> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way
> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

I think only bison supports that directive.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-28 14:24:10 Re: code coverage patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-08-28 13:32:45 Re: code coverage patch