From: | Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |
Date: | 2016-01-28 11:40:49 |
Message-ID: | 9619d741-b157-48c4-9a69-12ad3bcc7655@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> So even if the main packages switched to
> compiling with mingw, we'd probably still want to support MSVC.
MinGV more accessible. We can always say that after the release of X is not
supported by the MSVC.
I do not propose to abandon the MSVC but its use to be justified.
> Are we moving forward with the CMake stuff? It would be *awesome* to
> get rid of the MSVC build scripts, and perhaps we can move forward on
> some smaller items such as PGDLLEXPORT markings as well.
>
Linux build done with installcheck tests. We testing this under CentOS7,
Debian8, Gentoo, Ubuntu.
MSVC build 50% done. Yesterday made the work of the gendef.pl under CMake.
Current issues:
https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake/issues
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yury Zhuravlev | 2016-01-28 11:48:18 | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |
Previous Message | Yury Zhuravlev | 2016-01-28 11:27:43 | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |