Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Date: 2016-01-28 11:40:49
Message-ID: 9619d741-b157-48c4-9a69-12ad3bcc7655@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So even if the main packages switched to
> compiling with mingw, we'd probably still want to support MSVC.
MinGV more accessible. We can always say that after the release of X is not
supported by the MSVC.
I do not propose to abandon the MSVC but its use to be justified.

> Are we moving forward with the CMake stuff? It would be *awesome* to
> get rid of the MSVC build scripts, and perhaps we can move forward on
> some smaller items such as PGDLLEXPORT markings as well.
>
Linux build done with installcheck tests. We testing this under CentOS7,
Debian8, Gentoo, Ubuntu.
MSVC build 50% done. Yesterday made the work of the gendef.pl under CMake.

Current issues:
https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake/issues

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-01-28 11:48:18 Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-01-28 11:27:43 Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq