Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Date: 2016-01-28 11:48:18
Message-ID: 8b16a702-9412-4629-9966-eef756b18a81@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer wrote:
> Yeah, strongly agree there.
>
> CMake has excellent MSVC support btw.

Yes... but I found only hack way for call gendef.pl in pre_link stage (get
objects folder name). CMake suggests that we use for normal MSVC ways to
create dll.

> OTOH MinGW relies on reverse-engineered headers, an old gcc fork, and has had some pretty nasty bugs.

You about MinGW or MinGW64?
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artur Zakirov 2016-01-28 11:50:24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-01-28 11:40:49 Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq