Re: Logical replication existing data copy

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Logical replication existing data copy
Date: 2017-03-30 21:44:22
Message-ID: 9614f59cbb938b65dfa22c292eea4f85@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


(At the moment using these patches for tests:)
0001-Reserve-global-xmin-for-create-slot-snasphot-export.patch +
0002-Don-t-use-on-disk-snapshots-for-snapshot-export-in-l.patch+
0003-Prevent-snapshot-builder-xmin-from-going-backwards.patch +
0004-Fix-xl_running_xacts-usage-in-snapshot-builder.patch +
0005-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch +
and now (Tuesday 30) added :
0001-Fix-remote-position-tracking-in-logical-replication.patch

> I think what you have seen is because of this:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b235fa69-147a-5e09-f8f3-3f780a1abb2e(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com#b235fa69-147a-5e09-f8f3-3f780a1abb2e@2ndquadrant.com
>

You were right: with that 6th patch (and wal_sender_timout back at its
default 60s) there are no errors either (I tested on all 3
test-machines).

I must have missed that last patch when you posted it. Anyway all seems
fine now; I hope the above patches can all be committed soon.

thanks,

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-03-30 22:01:39 Re: [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-03-30 21:29:55 Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes