Re: some unused parameters cleanup

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: some unused parameters cleanup
Date: 2020-08-25 17:50:55
Message-ID: 9612131a-b666-ce3b-e0ac-74f304cf3228@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/25/20 7:42 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:59:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Here is a series of patches to remove some unused function parameters.
>>> In each case, the need for them was removed by some other code changes
>>> over time but the unusedness was not noticed. I have included a
>>> reference to when they became unused in each case.
>>
>> For some of these, there's an argument for keeping the unused parameter
>> for consistency with sibling functions that do use it. Not sure how
>> important that is, though.
>
> I think if they are kept for that reason, we should document that so we
> know not to revisit this issue for them.

+1

That way we can avoid new people discovering the same unused parameters
and then submitting patches for them.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-08-25 17:59:35 Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-08-25 17:49:51 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods