Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-16 17:17:25
Message-ID: 961.1171646245@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan escribi:
>> Well, the first question is "which table should these tests actually be
>> using, and why?" Then they can be changed or moved as appropriate.

> I just committed my patch before reading this comment. Maybe it was
> rushed.

Yes, it was: you now have two duplicate tests in timestamp.sql, and
no corresponding test in timestamptz.sql. It looks to me like the
submitter intended to be testing timestamp_tbl in the former file
and the same tests against timestamptz_tbl in the latter. Please
recheck the diff and fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-02-16 17:49:36 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-16 16:54:47 Re: patch adding new regexp functions