Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical
Date: 2017-11-28 15:21:52
Message-ID: 960ff6d0-4e7d-20c5-adc6-96f774187568@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/27/17 21:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 9/22/17 15:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I suggest you create a patch that focuses on the --create part.
>>>
>>> You can create a separate follow-on patch for the --start part if you
>>> wish, but I think that that patch would be rejected.
>>
>> I have moved this entry to the next commit fest, awaiting your updated
>> patch.
>
> Still waiting for an update, and marked as returned with feedback. It
> seems to me that your patch adds a couple of option interactions, so
> this should be double-checked with exiting options and a set of TAP
> tests should be added as well.

It seems the author hasn't posted in two months, so maybe this patch is
dead for now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-11-28 15:33:52 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-28 15:19:13 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support