Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2016-11-10 19:40:08
Message-ID: 9504.1478806808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> I would recommend making it behave as Tom suggested. *Then* add an
> --autodetect or similar option that makes
> behave in the 'finding and using what it could' manner as a 2nd patch.

An "--autodetect" switch would be fine with me. I just don't want it
to behave that way by default, because then you get into the unexpected
results problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-11-10 20:13:05 checkpoint_flush_after and friends
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2016-11-10 19:32:27 Re: WIP: About CMake v2