| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: \h tab-completion |
| Date: | 2017-02-03 12:12:08 |
| Message-ID: | 93c9e87e-2199-9fe2-ed33-34ca9369e16a@proxel.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/25/2017 07:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> What I think you should do is making the code path of
> \\h smarter with some exceptions by using TailMatchesCS2() for ALTER.
> There is as well the case of DROP commands that should be treated by
> the way.
Yes, I think that is correct approach. I have attached a patch where I
add completion for \h ALTER and \h DROP.
Andreas
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| help-completion-v1.patch | text/x-patch | 3.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-02-03 12:15:16 | Re: Checksums by default? |
| Previous Message | Rafia Sabih | 2017-02-03 11:07:46 | Redundant comment in ExecutePlan |