| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-19 16:45:48 |
| Message-ID: | 93F65203F796F930503A0F62@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, November 19, 2006 09:28:17 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> That is not true .. that is only true if we publish -all ... if we
>> publish ?all, we are saying that anything coming from "a mx" are
>> *definitely* from @postgresql.org, and that from other sources they
>> *might* be ... with ?all, it becomes more a means of Scoring for spam
>> filters like Spamassassin then anything else ...
>
> You continue to operate under the assumption that SPF has something to
> do with spam. It doesn't.
Then obviously you are not as well-informed as you like to think you are:
"SpamAssassin 3.0 supports SPF to detect and penalize header forgery."
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFYIo84QvfyHIvDvMRArlQAJ9rmKMYsjUuKDHvClKS85u47CB9RACfei9h
9eDBWdfJzVRYusa8nKHZy4g=
=K/Rk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-19 17:05:56 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-11-19 14:31:53 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |