RE: [GENERAL] SQL Question

From: Michael Davis <michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com>
To: "'Matthew'" <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] SQL Question
Date: 1999-03-10 06:05:08
Message-ID: 93C04F1F5173D211A27900105AA8FCFC145260@lambic.prevuenet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes, the "having" clause is supported in 6.4.2 with some restrictions as
outlined in the documentation on the web site.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew [SMTP:matt(at)ctlno(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 10:46 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] SQL Question

I am using RH5.2 / Postgre 6.3.2 I need a query that has a having
clause. In 6.3.2 it says that having is not supported yet. I
looked
at the changes in 6.4 and it appears that 6.4.2 supports this. Is
this
true? Also I have found 6.4.2 rpms but no data rpm so now when I
try to
use psql it says pgReadData() -- backend closed the channel
unexpectedly.

Please help.

Matt

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kaare Rasmussen 1999-03-10 06:14:24 Re: [GENERAL] Calcuate percentage.
Previous Message Matthew 1999-03-10 05:45:36 SQL Question