Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-26 16:09:59
Message-ID: 937d27e10901260809q3907eb7bica37b5a131b61968@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Put another way, the choice here is whether to have a half-baked delayed 8.4
>> release in 6 months or a polished on-time 8.5 release in 12 months. Either way
>> the feature ships and on a not terribly different timeline either.
>
> This is pretty much exactly how I see it. *Hot standby is not ready*,
> and committing it into 8.4 isn't going to magically make that better.
> The earliest we are going to have a HS feature that I would trust my
> data to is probably ten-twelve months off.

So can you give us an idea of what parts of the code are in need of
rethinking etc? I assume you've looked at it now if you can estimate
it's going to take another 10 -12 months?

I ask because I've only seen Heikki doing any in depth public review,
and he suggested a couple of weeks for the outstanding issues he's
aware of.

If there are fundamental problems which will take 10 - 12 months to
resolve to our normal standards, then I do believe 8.5 would be more
appropriate.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-26 16:10:09 Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-01-26 16:09:01 Re: foreign_data test fails with non-C locale