Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date: 2008-12-01 15:09:23
Message-ID: 937d27e10812010709u5a290f70kf47f90a70b8d487a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:

> it depends on how you look at it, I suppose. If you look at ":xy" as "x"
> being the 10s position and "y" being the 1s position, it makes no sense.

Suffice it to say, I don't look at it that way :-). I'd wager most
people wouldn't either, but I have no data to back that up of course.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-12-01 15:13:41 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-01 15:07:47 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict