Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date: 2008-12-01 15:13:41
Message-ID: 5377C5A3-68DB-4BCE-B197-7435A82BEFBE@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
>> Oh, well yeah, it should be consistent. But I'm still not sure
>> that :3
>> should be allowed. OTOH, who does that, anyway?
>
> Anyone who prints times as %d:%d:%d. You can find those in the wild.

I guess I should have expected that. Sheesh.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-12-01 15:14:18 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-12-01 15:09:23 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict