From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can we lock down the old developer wiki? |
Date: | 2008-04-29 08:59:16 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10804290159i360dc911ye2984a386ec173b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > We could probably hack up an apache rewrite rule to do it at the http
> > level if we're now happy to completely lose the old wiki.
> >
>
> In the last month I've fished three things out of the old wiki that didn't
> make it over to the new one: one from my user page, one from a talk page,
> and another thing I realized I needed out of the old page history. There's
> still a small amount of information that's there but not on the new one
> people may yet miss.
>
> In that same time, exactly one person made two trivial wasted changes to
> the old wiki in a session, went "oops, did that on the wrong one", then made
> the same changes to the correct wiki shortly afterward. My response
> remains: so what? That's a really small problem. Sure, eventually the old
> site will go poof, but I'm not seeing any evidence that needs to be
> accelerated--especially since there are some small unmigrated bits lingering
> around.
Fair 'enuff.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-29 09:02:32 | Re: Can we lock down the old developer wiki? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-04-29 08:58:49 | Re: Can we lock down the old developer wiki? |