Re: License question

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: License question
Date: 2008-04-25 08:16:10
Message-ID: 937d27e10804250116q4e62b993o824b0bb30af766f0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> From
> what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under
> the Artistic License and freely available. Correct?

Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licence in the
same way as GPL - use the same (Artistic) licence and release the
source code.

If you are able to separate your code from the pgAdmin code however,
it may make sense to dual licence the pgScript engine - have it under
Artistic for bundling in pgAdmin, and BSD for possible future
integration with psql.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-04-25 08:16:46 Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?
Previous Message Mickael Deloison 2008-04-25 08:10:57 License question