From: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Making Vars outer-join aware |
Date: | 2023-05-29 12:01:03 |
Message-ID: | 9290bdfc-cc61-4b78-27ea-340237e341b3@inbox.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello and sorry for the big delay in reply!
On 04.05.2023 15:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS the change you propose would serve only to mask bugs.
Yes, it's a bad decision.
> Under what circumstances would you be trying to inject INDEX_VAR
> into a nullingrel set? Only outer-join relids should ever appear there.
The thing is that i don't try to push INDEX_VAR into a nullingrel set at all,
i just try to replace the existing rt_index that equals to INDEX_VAR in Var nodes with
the defined positive indexes by using ChangeVarNodes_walker() function call. It checks
if the nullingrel contains the existing rt_index and does it need to be updated too.
It calls bms_is_member() for that, but the last immediately throws an error
if the value to be checked is negative like INDEX_VAR.
But we are not trying to corrupt the existing nullingrel with this bad index,
so it doesn't seem like an serious error.
And this index certainly cannot be a member of the Bitmapset.
Therefore it also seems better and more logical to me in the case of an index that
cannot possibly be a member of the Bitmapset, immediately return false.
Here is a patch like that.
With the best regards,
--
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-bms_is_member-fix.patch | text/x-patch | 726 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-05-29 12:31:24 | Re: BF animal dikkop reported a failure in 035_standby_logical_decoding |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-29 11:03:05 | Re: BF animal dikkop reported a failure in 035_standby_logical_decoding |