| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |
| Date: | 2019-03-07 08:56:54 |
| Message-ID: | 92185e59-8272-af98-539c-43afd1d9423e@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/6/19 6:16 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> This CF entry shows Pavel and me as reviewers, but the included
> patches were also produced by one or the other of us, so additional
> review by someone who isn't us seems appropriate. :)
>
> Would it make sense to remove one or both of us from the 'reviewers'
> field in the app, to make it more obviously 'available' for reviewing?
I think it makes sense to remove both of you so I have done so. I think
it is assumed that co-authors will review each others work, and as you
say it will make it harder for you to get additional reviewers.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-07 09:06:24 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2019-03-07 08:54:09 | Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code |