Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Date: 2019-03-06 16:16:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This CF entry shows Pavel and me as reviewers, but the included
patches were also produced by one or the other of us, so additional
review by someone who isn't us seems appropriate. :)

Would it make sense to remove one or both of us from the 'reviewers'
field in the app, to make it more obviously 'available' for reviewing?

One of the patches deals only with docs, so even someone who isn't
sure about reviewing XML functionality, but takes an interest in
documentation, would have a valuable role looking at that.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-06 16:17:44 Re: pg_dump is broken for partition tablespaces
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-03-06 15:56:04 Re: Make drop database safer