Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Date: 2000-02-26 01:17:17
Message-ID: 9092.951527837@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
> Well...here's an example of a view that worked in 6.5, with an 8KB
> block size, that fails in 7.0 unless I build with a 16KB block size:

> create view ec_products_displayable
> as
> select * from ec_products
> where active_p='t';

> You know, I've investigated further and the rule string itself is
> no where near 8KB. More like 1KB. So there is more to the story
> than just the string itself.

Really? That's interesting. Could you send me a test case
(create table and create view commands)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-02-26 01:17:37 Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-26 01:15:52 Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings