| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 17 release announcement draft |
| Date: | 2024-09-05 09:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 906be4b7-9066-43db-8047-d34d85dff3ad@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04.09.24 23:05, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Attached is the draft of the PostgreSQL 17 release announcement. This is
> a draft of the text that will go into the press kit, with the key
> portions to review starting from the top of the document, up until the
> "About PostgreSQL" section.
I noticed that we don't yet have a list of major features in the PG17
release notes. We should probably put that in soon, so that what we
list there and what is in the announcement are consistent.
On the actual list, there will be lots of opinions to be had, but I'll
just offer one: I don't think the MERGE RETURNING clause deserves twice
as much space as incremental backup.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alicja Kucharczyk | 2024-09-05 09:42:21 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 release announcement draft |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2024-09-04 21:05:00 | PostgreSQL 17 release announcement draft |