| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: stored procedure stats in collector |
| Date: | 2008-05-14 00:43:19 |
| Message-ID: | 9048.1210725799@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Now I just realized that the current patch doesn't handle this quite
> correctly. Modified patch attached.
I'm starting to look through this now, and I notice that the various
code paths in execQual.c are not too consistent about whether it counts
as a call if a strict function is skipped over because of NULL
arguments. I'm inclined to make it uniformly say that that's not a call
and is not included in the stats --- any objections?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-14 01:55:53 | Re: Syntax decisions for pl/pgsql RAISE extension |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2008-05-14 00:20:27 | Re: Syntax decisions for pl/pgsql RAISE extension |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-14 00:43:28 | Re: Making sure \timing is on |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-13 23:11:01 | Re: Making sure \timing is on |