From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump? |
Date: | 2021-08-27 22:51:02 |
Message-ID: | 901655.1630104662@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 8/27/21 2:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Those queries are coming from getFormattedTypeName(), which is used
>> for function arguments and the like. I'm not quite sure why Hubert
>> is seeing 5000 such calls in a database with only ~100 functions;
>> surely they don't all have an average of 50 arguments?
> Could be.
Maybe. I'm disturbed by the discrepancy between my result (about
10% of pg_dump's queries are these) and Hubert's (over 50% are).
I'd like to know the reason for that before we push forward.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gilar Ginanjar | 2021-08-28 00:31:42 | Re: Unexpected block ID found when reading data |
Previous Message | ourdiaspora | 2021-08-27 22:50:31 | Re: use fopen unknown resource |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-08-27 23:24:55 | Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-08-27 22:47:53 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |