Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support
Date: 2017-05-06 10:44:40
Message-ID: 8e1fc5d8-ad80-b88a-262a-690292bb9141@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/05/2017 02:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> + This option is obsolete but still accepted for backwards
> + compatibility.
> Isn't that incorrect English?

No.

> It seems to me that this be non-plural,
> as "for backward compatibility".

"Backwards" is not plural, it's a regional variation of "backward" (or
vice versa depending on which region you come from). Both are correct.

--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2017-05-06 10:56:06 Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-06 10:40:42 Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher