From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support |
Date: | 2017-05-06 10:44:40 |
Message-ID: | 8e1fc5d8-ad80-b88a-262a-690292bb9141@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/05/2017 02:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> + This option is obsolete but still accepted for backwards
> + compatibility.
> Isn't that incorrect English?
No.
> It seems to me that this be non-plural,
> as "for backward compatibility".
"Backwards" is not plural, it's a regional variation of "backward" (or
vice versa depending on which region you come from). Both are correct.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2017-05-06 10:56:06 | Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-06 10:40:42 | Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher |