Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support
Date: 2017-05-06 10:56:06
Message-ID: 2dd6c72f-e692-de68-15d1-9f55cd751b4f@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/05/17 22:44, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 05/05/2017 02:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> + This option is obsolete but still accepted for backwards
>> + compatibility.
>> Isn't that incorrect English?
> No.
>
>> It seems to me that this be non-plural,
>> as "for backward compatibility".
> "Backwards" is not plural, it's a regional variation of "backward" (or
> vice versa depending on which region you come from). Both are correct.
>
I am English, born & bred, and 'Backwards' feels a lot more natural to me.

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-06 12:02:10 Re: [PROPOSAL] Use SnapshotAny in get_actual_variable_range
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2017-05-06 10:44:40 Re: password_encryption, default and 'plain' support