Re: Ryu floating point output patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Ryu floating point output patch
Date: 2019-02-17 16:45:47
Message-ID: 8ddc8760-6c8c-23ee-f9ad-650ad4951083@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2/17/19 10:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>> I'd been holding off responding in the hope of other opinions, but for
>> what it's worth, I *really* dislike having pg_dump depend magically on
>> some new environment variable.
> Likewise.

Sure, no problem here - that was just a POC. I did it that way to
minimize the code involved.

>
>> b) new command-line option, e.g. pg_dump --extra-float-digits=0
>> This is probably the safest option, IMO. Any preferences as to the
>> option name?
> I like that too, assuming that it can be made to fit into the
> structure of the cross-version-upgrade tests (which would have
> to know to use it only with >= v12 pg_dump).
>
> --extra-float-digits seems fine as a name.
>
>

There are all sorts of version-specific things done there. The code will
be pretty minimal. We'll only invoke it if the target version is >= 12
and the source version is <= 11.

I can do this if we're agreed.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-02-17 16:47:09 Re: Reaping Temp tables to avoid XID wraparound
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2019-02-17 16:29:56 Re: Actual Cost