| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |
| Date: | 2019-02-17 15:56:06 |
| Message-ID: | 5363.1550418966@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> I'd been holding off responding in the hope of other opinions, but for
> what it's worth, I *really* dislike having pg_dump depend magically on
> some new environment variable.
Likewise.
> b) new command-line option, e.g. pg_dump --extra-float-digits=0
> This is probably the safest option, IMO. Any preferences as to the
> option name?
I like that too, assuming that it can be made to fit into the
structure of the cross-version-upgrade tests (which would have
to know to use it only with >= v12 pg_dump).
--extra-float-digits seems fine as a name.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-17 16:09:27 | Re: CPU costs of random_zipfian in pgbench |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2019-02-17 15:34:36 | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |