Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date: 2017-02-15 14:20:02
Message-ID: 8c673d74-8385-438e-c89d-be63f731da67@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/15/2017 06:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 13 February 2017 at 05:21, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> If I issue DROP TABLE elsewhere, it doesn't refuse to drop because it
> has indexes, sequences etc on it. So why should it just because it has
> partitions?

Because partitions may have data.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-02-15 14:37:34 Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-02-15 14:10:29 Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning