| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-02-15 14:37:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20170215143734.eb2io4k6qmktjbiy@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 06:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 13 February 2017 at 05:21, Amit Langote
> > <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> > If I issue DROP TABLE elsewhere, it doesn't refuse to drop because it
> > has indexes, sequences etc on it. So why should it just because it has
> > partitions?
>
> Because partitions may have data.
So would the table, were it not partitioned.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-02-15 14:52:34 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2017-02-15 14:20:02 | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |