Re: House style for DocBook documentation?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Date: 2019-02-15 16:31:53
Message-ID: 8c02f9b5-965e-ce51-2b20-e70c0d46a6a0@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-01-26 09:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>>> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output. Is that
>>> different from what you are saying?
>> That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and
>> had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled.
>>
>> Yes, it could very possibly indicate that.
>>
>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>>
>> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>>
>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
>> hesitation?
>
> I think it's obsolete, yes.

Committed that change.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-02-15 16:36:15 Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-15 16:31:30 Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs