|From:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: House style for DocBook documentation?|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On 2019-01-26 09:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>>> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output. Is that
>>> different from what you are saying?
>> That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and
>> had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled.
>> Yes, it could very possibly indicate that.
>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
> I think it's obsolete, yes.
Committed that change.
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2019-02-15 16:36:15||Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions|
|Previous Message||Andres Freund||2019-02-15 16:31:30||Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs|