Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points?
Date: 2025-10-29 15:41:16
Message-ID: 8b6978c0-f888-4622-9a16-6ca12f7979ad@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.10.25 22:54, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I went back to using the check for __cplusplus, and added a comment
> that hopefully clarifies things.

Yes, that looks more helpful now.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-10-29 15:51:18 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-10-29 15:38:14 Re: Remove specific \r\n code in TAP for Windows