Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.

From: Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
Date: 2009-11-16 09:00:56
Message-ID: 8a1bfe660911160100t46d4762fo2e927ab501eb83e4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Here is my plan :
> - rebuilding a spare with ext3, raid10, without lvm
> - switch the slony master to this new node.

Done 3 days ago : Problem solved ! It totally worked. \o/

--
ker2x
sysadmin & DBA @ http://www.over-blog.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eddy Escardo-Raffo 2009-11-16 11:18:25 Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-16 01:23:19 Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column