Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.

From: Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
Date: 2009-11-12 14:21:25
Message-ID: 8a1bfe660911120621x261a19c7r972ddb4a97080ca9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi !

Here is my plan :
- rebuilding a spare with ext3, raid10, without lvm
- switch the slony master to this new node.

We'll see ...
Thx for all the info !!!

--
Ker2x

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wayne Beaver 2009-11-12 14:33:01 Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?
Previous Message Brahma Prakash Tiwari 2009-11-12 08:18:31 Why age (datfrozenxid) in postgres becomes 1073742202 not zero after each vacuum of database.