RE: Status of new relation file naming

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-15 00:02:30
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018CC8@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Philip Warner mentioned about the advantage of random number.
> It's exactly what I've wanted to say.
>
> >> it removes the temptation to write utilities that rely on
> >> the internal representation of our data.
>
> It is preferable that file naming rule is encapsulated so that we
> can change it without notice.

So, I assume that you vote YES on this subject? -:)
(As far as I remember, it was your idea).

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-09-15 00:10:50 RE: Status of new relation file naming
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-09-14 23:57:17 RE: strange behaviour (bug)