RE: Status of new relation file naming

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-15 00:19:34
Message-ID: 000801c01eaa$9fd53e80$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikheev, Vadim [mailto:vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM]
>
> > Philip Warner mentioned about the advantage of random number.
> > It's exactly what I've wanted to say.
> >
> > >> it removes the temptation to write utilities that rely on
> > >> the internal representation of our data.
> >
> > It is preferable that file naming rule is encapsulated so that we
> > can change it without notice.
>
> So, I assume that you vote YES on this subject? -:)
> (As far as I remember, it was your idea).
>

Yes.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-09-15 01:01:24 Re: Dumping views as views?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-15 00:17:30 Re: Performance improvement hints + measurement