| From: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: mention unused_oids script in pg_proc.dat |
| Date: | 2025-05-24 10:34:12 |
| Message-ID: | 8BEEFD99-E003-460B-8141-6EBC08BAB116@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 24 May 2025, at 12:24 PM, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
>
>> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
>> It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
>> but imho it should be closer to the src (and more succinct/less verbose too).
>
> Maybe these READMEs can simply contain little more than links to the
> built HTML docs, to avoid having multiple sources of info.
>
>> Looking at some of the text in 67.2.2. OID Assignment for example,
>> a few things look outdated wrt choosing OIDs.
>>
>> One can look through the history of similar commits to see what
>> needs to be changed; So it’s not THAT bad.
>
> Sure, outdated docs is something that happens. Patches welcome.
>
Something like this ?
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-catalog-readme.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.0 KB |
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 2 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-05-24 10:37:52 | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-05-24 10:28:02 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |