| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: mention unused_oids script in pg_proc.dat |
| Date: | 2025-05-24 09:24:26 |
| Message-ID: | 202505240924.i7oah25jtb5x@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
> It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
> but imho it should be closer to the src (and more succinct/less verbose too).
Maybe these READMEs can simply contain little more than links to the
built HTML docs, to avoid having multiple sources of info.
> Looking at some of the text in 67.2.2. OID Assignment for example,
> a few things look outdated wrt choosing OIDs.
>
> One can look through the history of similar commits to see what
> needs to be changed; So it’s not THAT bad.
Sure, outdated docs is something that happens. Patches welcome.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Cómo ponemos nuestros dedos en la arcilla del otro. Eso es la amistad; jugar
al alfarero y ver qué formas se pueden sacar del otro" (C. Halloway en
La Feria de las Tinieblas, R. Bradbury)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-05-24 10:28:02 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-05-24 09:10:44 | Re: MERGE issues around inheritance |