Re: mention unused_oids script in pg_proc.dat

From: Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mention unused_oids script in pg_proc.dat
Date: 2025-05-24 10:34:12
Message-ID: 8BEEFD99-E003-460B-8141-6EBC08BAB116@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 May 2025, at 12:24 PM, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
>
>> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
>> It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
>> but imho it should be closer to the src (and more succinct/less verbose too).
>
> Maybe these READMEs can simply contain little more than links to the
> built HTML docs, to avoid having multiple sources of info.
>
>> Looking at some of the text in 67.2.2. OID Assignment for example,
>> a few things look outdated wrt choosing OIDs.
>>
>> One can look through the history of similar commits to see what
>> needs to be changed; So it’s not THAT bad.
>
> Sure, outdated docs is something that happens. Patches welcome.
>

Something like this ?

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-catalog-readme.patch application/octet-stream 1.0 KB
unknown_filename text/plain 2 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-05-24 10:37:52 Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2025-05-24 10:28:02 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication