| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 19:09:41 |
| Message-ID: | 8963.1164049781@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the
>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would
>> be non-trivial.
> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some
> buildfarm testing going.
My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-20 19:18:39 | Re: Further MSVC build updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-20 18:17:23 | Severity of elog(FATAL) should vary by process |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-20 19:18:39 | Re: Further MSVC build updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-20 16:46:15 | Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity |