Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Date: 2006-11-20 20:21:49
Message-ID: 45620E5D.4040909@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the
>>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would
>>> be non-trivial.
>>>
>
>
>> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some
>> buildfarm testing going.
>>
>
> My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
> depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
> breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
>
>
>

Fine by me.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Buttafuoco 2006-11-20 20:53:58 Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 20:20:29 Re: Localization of abbreviated day names

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 20:33:33 Re: xlog lockup patch (was: BUG #2712: could not fsync
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 19:31:27 Re: Update to mingw FAQ