| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 04:46:03 |
| Message-ID: | 889B5864-F5ED-4B7D-8A1E-1AC710B2A177@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> You sure about the "staged" part?
Yes, I do it all the time (I make a lot of mistakes).
> Offhand I think I like Andrew's recommendation of a shortlived branch
> better. In essence your idea is using the tip of "master" itself as a
> shortlived branch, which is maybe a bit too cute. If you get distracted
> and need to do something else for awhile, the tip of "master" is not
> where you want your not-yet-pushable work to be.
Yes, I think using branches for everything is generally the way to go. But if you wanted to just use your existing approach, then reset --soft HEAD^ would work, too.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-09-22 05:13:34 | Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-09-22 04:44:58 | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |