Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas
Date: 2010-09-22 05:13:34
Message-ID: 1285132414.15691.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2010-09-19 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. If we had a \dnS option, what I would sorta expect it to do is
> show the "system" schemas pg_catalog and information_schema. The
> toast
> and temp schemas seem like a different category somehow. On the other
> hand, if we did it like this, then the S and + modifiers would be
> orthogonal which is a nice property.

Well, normally the + option shows more columns and the S option shows
more rows. Showing more "internal" objects with + might be a bit
confusing.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-22 05:38:57 Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-09-22 04:46:03 Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited