Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Date: 2006-11-24 19:08:34
Message-ID: 8864.1164395314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Not sure if people want this for 8.2. I think we can modify
> test_fsync.c anytime but the movement of the defines into an include
> file is a backend code change.

I think fooling with this on the day before RC1 is an unreasonable risk ...
and I disapprove of moving this code into a widely-used include file
like xlog.h, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-24 19:21:24 RC1 blocker issues
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-11-24 19:07:40 Re: Integrating Replication into Core

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-24 22:23:51 Re: Error in from_char() for field 'D'?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 18:58:45 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 23:43:36 Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 18:58:45 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues