Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?
Date: 2018-12-18 16:40:49
Message-ID: 8821.1545151249@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:13:42PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I think we need to accept the new output. It is saying that previously
>> we would not invoke the hook on SET TABLESPACE for a partitioned table,
>> which makes sense, and now we do invoke it, which also makes sense.

> Indeed, that looks right.

Agreed, done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-18 17:23:11 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-18 16:29:32 Re: dropdb --force