Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?
Date: 2018-12-18 07:45:30
Message-ID: 20181218074530.GB10603@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:13:42PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think we need to accept the new output. It is saying that previously
> we would not invoke the hook on SET TABLESPACE for a partitioned table,
> which makes sense, and now we do invoke it, which also makes sense.

Indeed, that looks right.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-12-18 07:49:07 Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Previous Message Hubert Zhang 2018-12-18 07:44:51 Discussion: Fast DB/Schema/Table disk size check in Postgresql